Skip to main content
Nuestra mejor elección: Revolut — El mejor banco de criptomonedas en general para la mayoría de los usuarios Abrir una cuenta ↗ (afiliado)
● HEAD-TO-HEAD · WALLETS WINNER: METAMASK (ETHEREUM) · PHANTOM (SOLANA & UX)

Phantom vs MetaMask

The two wallets compared — coin support, security model, open source, and price.

◆ SOFTWARE
Phantom
7.9 / 10

The best Solana wallet — and now multi-chain

Get Phantom ↗
vs.
◆ SOFTWARE
MetaMask
7.7 / 10

The world's most popular Ethereum wallet

Install MetaMask ↗
SK
Reviewed by Stephan Kulik · Last updated: · How we rank
§ 01 CARA A CARA

Comparación directa

Criteria Phantom MetaMask
Nuestra puntuación 7.9/10 ✓ 7.7/10
Primary Ecosystem Solana (+ Ethereum, Polygon, Bitcoin) Ethereum & EVM chains (30+)
UI/UX Design ✓ Cleanest in the industry Functional but dated
NFT Management ✓ Excellent — gallery view, burn spam NFTs Basic NFT display
Compatibilidad con dApps Strong for Solana; growing for EVM ✓ Universal — works with virtually every EVM dApp
Soporte de hardware wallet Ledger only ✓ Ledger, Trezor, Lattice1
Swap integrado Yes — with Jupiter aggregator Yes — MetaMask Swaps
Built-in Staking ✓ Yes — native SOL staking No native staking
Browser Extension Yes Yes
Precio Free Free
§ 02 PROS Y CONTRAS

Pros y contras

Phantom

  • +Cleanest UI of any crypto wallet
  • +Dominant Solana ecosystem integration
  • +Excellent NFT management
  • +Multi-chain support added (ETH, BTC)
  • +Free
  • Solana-first — less suited for Ethereum heavy users
  • No desktop app (browser extension + mobile only)
  • Smaller team vs MetaMask/Ledger
  • Limited coin support outside Solana ecosystem

MetaMask

  • +Most widely supported wallet — works with every major dApp
  • +Free to use
  • +Strong hardware wallet support
  • +Large developer ecosystem
  • Ethereum/EVM only — no native Bitcoin support
  • No customer support
  • Phishing attacks target MetaMask users frequently
  • Seed phrase recovery only — no social recovery
  • ConsenSys (parent) had controversial privacy policy update
§ 03 PREGUNTAS FRECUENTES

Preguntas frecuentes

Is Phantom better than MetaMask? +
For Solana users, yes — Phantom was built specifically for Solana and offers a far superior experience for SOL tokens, NFTs, and Solana DeFi. For Ethereum and EVM users, MetaMask remains the standard — its dApp compatibility is unmatched. Phantom has added Ethereum and Polygon support, but MetaMask's EVM integration is deeper.
Can Phantom replace MetaMask? +
Phantom now supports Ethereum and Polygon alongside Solana, so it can serve as a multi-chain wallet. However, many Ethereum dApps still default to MetaMask, and some don't yet support Phantom's EVM integration. Power DeFi users on Ethereum will still need MetaMask for full compatibility.
Does Phantom support Bitcoin? +
Yes — Phantom added native Bitcoin support in 2024. You can hold, send, and receive BTC directly in Phantom. MetaMask does not support native Bitcoin — it only works with EVM-compatible chains.
Which wallet has lower fees? +
Both wallets are free to download and use. Transaction fees are network fees (gas), which depend on the blockchain — Solana transactions via Phantom cost fractions of a cent, while Ethereum transactions via MetaMask can cost $1–50+ depending on network congestion. The wallet itself doesn't add to gas fees, but both charge a service fee on built-in swaps.
§ 04 COMPARAR TAMBIÉN

También comparar

esc
↑↓ navegar ↵ abrir esc cerrar